Every Painter Paints Himself
Every painter paints himself, a saying first documented in the early Renaissance, has been mentioned by artists ever since. Both Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci used it, as Picasso did too; Lucian Freud and other contemporary artists still cite variations today. Yet despite its great significance to artists, art scholars rarely discuss the saying or its meaning. Those who do seem to have no choice but to deny it: painters don’t really paint themselves, they say, but their sensibility. But why would a phrase that meant so much to great masters, and still does to their followers, require re-phrasing to mean anything? The truth is, as this website demonstrates, it is the images of these visual artists that are veiled, not their words.
Despite everything you have ever heard about art Every painter paints himself is the underlying principle of great art since at least the Renaissance and probably before. To artists and thinkers in the Renaissance, the human body was a microcosm of the universe and it was widely believed that the secrets of God’s creation could be found inside us. That is why both Michelangelo and Leonardo dissected corpses, breaking the law in the process. They were searching inside for the secrets of Creation and the cosmos.
Now forget almost everything you have ever been told about the visual arts. Great art is not, and has never been, a depiction of the exterior world. True artists never intended that, even if their patrons expected it. It would have been mere copying of nature. Regardless of initial appearances, all poetic art is an allegory of the artist’s own mind in the process of creation, and thus an allegory in miniature of God’s own creation. That is why ‘know yourself’ in a broader context is the motto of all mystics. Not everyone can see this, though, because as in difficult poetry, the true meaning of great art is hidden. The French painter Eugene Delacroix wrote “the eyes of many people are dull or false; they see objects literally, of the exquisite they see nothing.” Other masters have made similar remarks. If you change your perception, though, and stop imagining falsely that art is an early form of photography, the scene itself will change from a depiction of the exterior world to that of the artist’s own mind. The process is similar to how a Shakespearean play is mere entertainment for groundlings on one level while also providing, on a higher plane, an allegorical illustration of the poet’s own mind in the process of creation. Literary critics George Steiner and Elizabeth Sacks have each separately shown how. The same has been written of Dante’s Commedia.
The problem in art, going back to antiquity, is everyday vision. While we all know that words can be read on multiple levels, we do not grasp easily how sight can be too. We think that what we see is “fact” though our minds use just a tiny selection of the visual data they receive to create a scene of our own making. As humans we have much in common and thus see much alike but the differences can also be major as jurors soon discover. We each paint our own visual “reality” as a reflection of what we already know. Thus artists, learning this from each other’s art, do likewise and paint an allegorical view of their own mind with each figure as a specific alter ego. It is a traditional concept commonly accepted in literature that only the illusion of visual reality prevents us from seeing in art.
Once you know that every painter paints himself, every masterpiece of Western art has the potential to change before your eyes. Discover here some of the techniques that artists have long used to convey this and your perception of art will improve as dramatically as your enjoyment of it will also increase.
Most Recent Articles
Look at art from every which way you can. You never know what you might see.
Don't get misled by a charming scene. There's always more to see in the work of a real artist.
All Articles (Alphabetical by Artist, then Title)
Is this merely a scene of everyday life or something more important?
Sometimes objects with meaning are so prominent and so large, viewers miss them
Altdorfer's scene of incest is an early example of a long tradition with very similar and surprising meaning
Remember a few general principles and you will find that the art of understanding art is much easier than you might magine
Make sure you always know an artist's real name, the one the artist actually used. It's a very useful tool for interpretation.
Even anonymous art can be enjoyed through EPPH's methodology
Why would a German pacifist like Anselm Kiefer use a Nazi salute as one of his signature gestures?
Find out, even in the work of a little-known painter, how the executioner is the artist and the victim his painting.
If you keep an eye out for underlying shapes, you might even be able to guess the artist's name
Here is a good example of how borrowed form borrows meaning. In Artemisia's self-portrait as an Allegory of Painting, she thought of herself as a personification of Art...
Learn how one scene can turn into another through visual metamorphosis
If it looks odd, there must be a reason. See Balthus horsing around.
In a short addendum to Part 1, see how Balthus conveyed his alter ego
Learn how to deconstruct a portrait by Balthus using a few simple principles
Bandinelli's statue in Florence, known more for its competition with Michelangelo's David than for the statue itself, has lessons in it which help explain David
An artist's identification with God was as common in the 20th century as in the Renaissance
See how Giovanni Bellini used a visual pun to pass on his meaning
Find out how a giant Renaissance altarpiece is all about painting
Why would a great poet just depict fruit on a platter with no other content or meaning? The answer: they wouldn't.
How Bonnard turned his creative process into a scene in modern Paris
See how the second of a pair of paintings by Bosch is also "behind the eye."
A little knowledge of studios goes a long way to understanding art
This masterpiece, like many before and since, must have been the source of inspiration for Picasso's Cubism. As unlikely as that may sound, it all depends on what you can see in The Birth of Venus that experts never have. You'll be one of the first...
Pastoral genre scenes, although invented by Boucher, abide by art's traditions
Unless you knew that there might be a self-portrait in this Reclining Nude, you'd probably never see it.
This a reminder of how close the association was between writing and painting in the Middle Ages
How a seemingly extraneous figure can be the crux of the whole artwork
Find out how even Cézanne incorporated a mystical Christian view of life into his art
See how Cézanne created his masterpiece around the vast but hidden head of a girl
© Simon Abrahams. Articles on this site are the copyright of Simon Abrahams. To use copyrighted material in print or other media for purposes beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Websites may link to this page without permission (please do) but may not reproduce the material on their own site without crediting Simon Abrahams and EPPH.